Skoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,601 kg3,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range866 km538 mi
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score89/100
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,849kg4,076lb | 1,601kg3,530lb |
| Gross weight | 2,409kg5,311lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.6s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 829km515mi Calculated | 866km538mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,509mm178in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 835L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,065L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.6 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 866 km 538 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 829 km 515 mi | 866 km 538 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 220 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 248 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























