Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220vsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range829 km515 mi
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 630 km 391 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220 | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220
- Is 234 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 199 km (124 mi) more estimated range
- Has 410 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























