Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,521 kg3,353 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range829 km515 mi
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,521kg3,353lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.2s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.2 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Is 328 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 415 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























