Car comparison

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,521 kg
    3,353 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    829 km
    515 mi
  • Largest trunk
    835 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentor2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,521kg3,353lb
1,849kg4,076lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,409kg5,311lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
34.2s
Calculated
43.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
688km427mi
Calculated
829km515mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,450mm175in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,528mm60in
1,661mm65in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,790mm110in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,559mm61in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
192mm8in
Trunk volume
420L
835L
Max trunk volume-
2,065L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentor2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.2 s
43.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
1,849 kg
4,076 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
220 km/h
137 mph
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI7.1 s
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
688 km
427 mi
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
829 km
515 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
835 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentor2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentor2.0 TSISkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,521 kg
3,353 lb
1,849 kg
4,076 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,450 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,528 mm
60.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
835 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,661 mm
65.4 in
Range score
688 km
427 mi
829 km
515 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
835 L
29.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor 2.0 TSISkoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI

  • Is 328 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI

  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 415 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster