Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0vsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.4s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.4 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 249 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 234 km (145 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Has 385 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























