AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDIvsSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I · Facelift 2021
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,204 km748 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score92/100
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk835 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,849kg4,076lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,409kg5,311lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 43.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,204km748mi Calculated | 829km515mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 835L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 2,065L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 43.6 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI has 14 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,204 km 748 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 829 km 515 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SkodaKodiaq IFacelift 20212.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,849 kg 4,076 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,204 km 748 mi | 829 km 515 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 835 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI | Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 375 km (233 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I Facelift 2021 2.0 TSI
- Has 315 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























