Car comparison

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

200 hp1496 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.7 s
Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph Unrestricted
220 km/h
137 mph Restricted
Most powerful
200 hp
149 kW
Highest torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Best power-to-weight
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Largest trunk
456 L
Best overall score
63/100
Best performance score
54/100
Best economy score
91/100
Best practicality score
81/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Lightest
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power	200hp149kW	155hp116kW
Torque	320Nm236lb-ft	240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight	1,358kg2,994lb	1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight	1,815kg4,001lb	1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	68.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.7s	8.7s
0-200 km/h	27.5s Calculated	50.6s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.4s Calculated	8.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK	6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	14.7s Calculated	16.3s Calculated
Power-to-weight	147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated	120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated	186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	-	667km414mi Calculated
Displacement	1,496cc91cu in	999cc61cu in
Length	4,226mm166in	4,186mm165in
Width	1,805mm71in	1,805mm71in
Height	1,520mm60in	1,550mm61in
Wheelbase	2,588mm102in	2,588mm102in
Front track	-	1,567mm62in
Rear track	-	1,526mm60in
Ground clearance	152mm6in	163mm6in
Trunk volume	456L	456L
Max trunk volume	1,216L	1,216L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	-	42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoostFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500-3,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500 rpm	6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.4 s	8.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.7 s	8.7 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	27.5 s	50.6 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.7 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	7.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.7 s	10.7 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.4 s	13.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.7 s	16.3 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	158 km/h 98 mph	142 km/h 88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost has 45 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost: 45 hp (34 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	320 Nm 236 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	240 Nm 177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	1,358 kg 2,994 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	1,293 kg 2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.7 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	200 hp 149 kW	6.7 s	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW	8.7 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	6.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK	6.7 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK	8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost	147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power

200 hp

149 kW

155 hp

116 kW

Torque

320 Nm

236 lb-ft

240 Nm

177 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.7 s

8.7 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

230 km/h143 mph

Restricted

220 km/h137 mph

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

Lightness

1,358 kg

2,994 lb

1,293 kg

2,851 lb

Fuel consumption

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,226 mm 166.4 in
Height	1,520 mm 59.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Range score

667 km

414 mi

Trunk score

456 L

16.1 cu ft

456 L

16.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

147 hp/t

110 kW/t

6.8 kg/hp

120 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.3 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Puma ST 1.5 EcoBoost	Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK	6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.50 LC100 km	11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.90 LC100 mi	17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	900 L238 US gal198 UK gal	945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,575 LC/year	1,654 LC/year