Car comparison

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Morgan Aero 8

4.4 i V8 32V

286 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2010

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.0 s
Fastest top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Lightest
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
Best power-to-weight
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Best estimated range
565 km
351 mi
Best overall score
58/100
Best performance score
69/100
Best economy score
74/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Most powerful
310 hp
231 kW
Highest torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
Lowest city consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Best practicality score
42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power	286hp213kW	310hp231kW
Torque	430Nm317lb-ft	461Nm340lb-ft
Curb weight	1,000kg2,205lb	1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight	1,300kg2,866lb	1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed	257 km/h 160 mph	257 km/h 160 mph
To 99% top speed	52.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated	86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.0s	6.0s
0-200 km/h	16.2s Calculated	22.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	4.8s Calculated	5.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK	12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK	14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK	10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile	13.0s Calculated	14.1s Calculated
Power-to-weight	286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated	193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated	287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	565km351mi Calculated	512km318mi Calculated
Displacement	4,398cc268cu in	5,665cc346cu in
Length	4,120mm162in	4,914mm193in
Width	1,770mm70in	1,882mm74in
Height	1,200mm47in	1,315mm52in
Wheelbase	2,525mm99in	2,568mm101in
Front track	1,550mm61in	1,542mm61in
Rear track	1,500mm59in	1,540mm61in
Trunk volume	-	215L
Max trunk volume	-	930L
Doors	2	2
Seats	2	4
Fuel tank	70L	64L
CO2 emissions	-	293g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	5,500 rpm	3,700 rpm	5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	5,200 rpm	4,000 rpm	5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	4.8 s	5.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.0 s	6.0 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	16.2 s	22.8 s
Top speed	257 km/h 160 mph	257 km/h 160 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	5.8 s	6.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	8.6 s	9.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.0 s	11.9 s
1/4 mile 402 m	13.0 s	14.1 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	181 km/h 113 mph	163 km/h 101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	286 hp 213 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 24 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	430 Nm 317 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	461 Nm 340 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	1,000 kg 2,205 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	1,605 kg 3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	257 km/h 160 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	257 km/h 160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	6.0 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	565 km 351 mi
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	512 km 318 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	286 hp 213 kW	5.0 s	257 km/h 160 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW	6.0 s	257 km/h 160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V

Power	286 hp 213 kW
0-100 km/h	5.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,120 mm 162.2 in
Height	1,200 mm 47.2 in

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V

Power	286 hp 213 kW
0-100 km/h	5.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK	5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK	6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V	286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power

286 hp

213 kW

310 hp

231 kW

Torque

430 Nm

317 lb-ft

461 Nm

340 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.0 s

6.0 s

Top speed

257 km/h

160 mph

257 km/h

160 mph

Lightness

1,000 kg

2,205 lb

1,605 kg

3,538 lb

Fuel consumption

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,120 mm 162.2 in
Height	1,200 mm 47.2 in

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

Range score

565 km

351 mi

512 km

318 mi

CO2 score

293 g/km

Trunk score

215 L

7.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

286 hp/t

213 kW/t

3.5 kg/hp

193 hp/t

144 kW/t

5.2 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V	Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption	12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK	12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	21.70 LC100 km	21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	34.92 LC100 mi	34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal	1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,255 LC/year	3,255 LC/year