BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630ivsMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Aero 8
4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,000kg2,205lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,120mm162in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 350L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i: Power / Torque
- Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 6,600 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5,500 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V has 28 hp more than BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 6.9 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 729 km 453 mi |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i | Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series Convertible (E64) 630i
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 685 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 133 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























