BMW M3 Convertible (E46)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24VvsMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Aero 8
4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Best performance score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,000kg2,205lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.5s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 4,120mm162in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,363mm54in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,508mm59in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5,500 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has 57 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
Although BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 521 km 324 mi |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V | Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 65 Nm more
- Is 655 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 79 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























