BMW M3 (E90)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8vsBMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E46)
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range521 km324 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 508km316mi Calculated | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,492mm177in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,363mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,731mm108in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,508mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 300L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 has 77 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 77 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 508 km 316 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 521 km 324 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 508 km 316 mi | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Has 77 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























