Car comparison

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Morgan Aero 8

4.4 i V8 32V

286 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2010
VS

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    257 km/h
    160 mph
  • Lightest
    1,000 kg
    2,205 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    565 km
    351 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    472 Nm
    348 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
286hp213kW
310hp231kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
472Nm348lb-ft
Curb weight
1,000kg2,205lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,300kg2,866lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
52.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
16.2s
Calculated
21.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
565km351mi
Calculated
538km334mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,398cc268cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
4,120mm162in
4,914mm193in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,525mm99in
2,568mm101in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,500mm59in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume-
215L
Max trunk volume-
930L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
64L
CO2 emissions-
278g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V5,500 rpm3,700 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.2 s
21.2 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
113 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 24 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 24 hp (18 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
472 Nm
348 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
254 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85.5 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
565 km
351 mi
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
538 km
334 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
5.5 s
254 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
5.0 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
286 hp
213 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.5 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
565 km
351 mi
538 km
334 mi
CO2 score
-
278 g/km
Trunk score
-
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Is 605 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 93 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 i V8 32V
3.5 i V6 24V
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsNissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
4.4 i V8 32V
CLK 500
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
4.4 i V8 32V
4.6 i V8 24V
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Z28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
4.4 i V8 32V
4.2 V8
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
4.4 i V8 32V
630i
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)630i
4.4 i V8 32V
3.2i 24V
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
Z28 5.7 i V8
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
4.4 i V8 32V
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VvsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V vs Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster