Car comparison

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Morgan Aero 8

4.4 i V8 32V

286 hp4398 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2010
VS

Ford Mustang V Convertible

4.6 i V8 24V

304 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2005-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    257 km/h
    160 mph
  • Lightest
    1,000 kg
    2,205 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    286 hp/t
    213 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    69/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
286hp213kW
304hp227kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
434Nm320lb-ft
Curb weight
1,000kg2,205lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
1,300kg2,866lb
-
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
16.2s
Calculated
22.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb
Calculated
180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
565km351mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,398cc268cu in
4,601cc281cu in
Length
4,120mm162in
4,765mm188in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,877mm74in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,525mm99in
2,720mm107in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,500mm59in
1,600mm63in
Trunk volume-
275L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24VPowerTorque
  • Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V5,500 rpm3,700 rpm5,750 rpm
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V5,750 rpm4,500 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.2 s
22.2 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
181 km/h
113 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
304 hp
227 kW

Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has 18 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
434 Nm
320 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
257 km/h
160 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
286 hp
213 kW
5.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
304 hp
227 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
304 hp
227 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMorganAero 84.4 i V8 32VFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
Power
286 hp
213 kW
304 hp
227 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
434 Nm
320 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.3 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,000 kg
2,205 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,120 mm
162.2 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Length
4,765 mm
187.6 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
565 km
351 mi
-
Trunk score
-
275 L
9.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
180 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V

  • Is 685 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 106 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V vs Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V - car comparison - FastVsFaster