Morgan Aero 8
Car comparison
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32VvsFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang V Convertible
4.6 i V8 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score74/100
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
- Most powerful304 hp227 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,000kg2,205lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | - |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 68.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,120mm162in | 4,765mm188in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,525mm99in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 275L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5,500 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 304 hp 227 kW |
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has 18 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 5.3 s |
Although Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 304 hp 227 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Is 685 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 106 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 4 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























