Jaguar XK Convertible (X150)
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8vsMorgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Aero 8
4.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful298 hp222 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 298hp222kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,000kg2,205lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 1,300kg2,866lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 4,120mm162in |
| Width | - | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,329mm52in | 1,200mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,500mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 200L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 283L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5,500 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 has 12 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.3 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
Although Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 has more power, Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 and Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | MorganAero 84.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 298 hp 222 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 | Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Morgan Aero 8 4.4 i V8 32V
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 660 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 106 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























