Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999
AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range530 km329 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 461Nm340lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 86.6s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.8s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | 512km318mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,488mm59in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 293g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.8 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has 37 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 6.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 512 km 318 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8 | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 257 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | 512 km 318 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 293 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 49 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)CLK 320 V6
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C208)CLK 430 V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8