Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    900 km
    559 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
310hp231kW
275hp205kW
Torque
461Nm340lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,930kg4,255lb
2,120kg4,674lb
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
22.8s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
512km318mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,665cc346cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,914mm193in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,568mm101in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,542mm61in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,540mm61in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
215L
-
Max trunk volume
930L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
64L
72L
CO2 emissions
293g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.8 s
23.3 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 35 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V86.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05.9 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
512 km
318 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
900 km
559 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
6.0 s
257 km/h
160 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
6.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
310 hp
231 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
5.9 s
Top speed
257 km/h
160 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
512 km
318 mi
900 km
559 mi
CO2 score
293 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
215 L
7.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 61 Nm more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 388 km (241 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 112 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Z28 5.7 i V8
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
3.6 V6
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
CLK 500
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI
Z28 5.7 i V8
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
2.0
GLC 350d
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Z28 5.7 i V8
645Ci
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)645Ci
2.0
R 2.0 TSI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI
Z28 5.7 i V8
3.2i 24V
VS
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster