Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque461 Nm340 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,636kg3,607lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | - |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 90.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 24.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 512km318mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,811mm111in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 206L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 293g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 24.9 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 35 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,636 kg 3,607 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 512 km 318 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 293 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 206 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 61 Nm more
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























