Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018

2.0 T

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    179 hp/t
    133 kW/t
    5.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VI2.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275hp205kW
275hp205kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,636kg3,607lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
89.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
24.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
900km559mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,897mm75in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,348mm53in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,811mm111in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,618mm64in
Trunk volume-
206L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
72L
72L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T5,600 rpm3,000-4,500 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VI2.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
24.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
160 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
275 hp
205 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
1,636 kg
3,607 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05.9 s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
275 hp
205 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VI2.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
Power
275 hp
205 kW
275 hp
205 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,636 kg
3,607 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Range score
900 km
559 mi
-
CO2 score
181 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
206 L
7.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Is 97 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster