Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 2.0 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
2.0 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Lightest1,512 kg3,333 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,512kg3,333lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 900km559mi Calculated | 766km476mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,811mm111in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 258L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5,600 rpm | 3,000-4,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5.9 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 900 km 559 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 766 km 476 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,512 kg 3,333 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 900 km 559 mi | 766 km 476 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 2.0 T
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























