Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSIvsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,426 kg3,144 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score85/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,426kg3,144lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.3s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km427mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,248mm167in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 312L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 187g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.3 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 1,426 kg 3,144 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 5.7 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 688 km 427 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,426 kg 3,144 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 427 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 187 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 R 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 113 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 213 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























