Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

2.0

275 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)

GLC 350d

258 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d

  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    169 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,065 km
    661 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    63/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Lightest
    1,539 kg
    3,393 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    179 hp/t
    133 kW/t
    5.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VI2.0Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Power
275hp205kW
258hp192kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,840kg4,057lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,530kg5,578lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
238 km/h
148 mph
To 99% top speed
81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
89.4s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
23.2s
Calculated
28.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
900km559mi
Calculated
1,065km661mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,732mm186in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,602mm63in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,873mm113in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,620mm64in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,619mm64in
Trunk volume-
500L
Max trunk volume-
1,400L
Doors
2
4
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
72L
66L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
169g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350dPowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05,500 rpm3,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d3,400 rpm1,600-2,400 rpm3,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VI2.0Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.2 s
28.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
238 km/h
148 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
258 hp
192 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has 17 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
1,840 kg
4,057 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
238 km/h
148 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.05.9 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d6.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
900 km
559 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
1,065 km
661 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
275 hp
205 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
258 hp
192 kW
6.2 s
238 km/h
148 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,732 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,602 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Power
258 hp
192 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.9 s
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VI2.0Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350d
Power
275 hp
205 kW
258 hp
192 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
238 km/h
148 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,840 kg
4,057 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,732 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,602 mm
63.1 in
Range score
900 km
559 mi
1,065 km
661 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
169 g/km
Trunk score
-
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
179 hp/t
133 kW/t
5.6 kg/hp
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Is 301 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
GLC 350d
GLC 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019GLC 300
2.0
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
GLC 350d
GLC 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 300
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
GLC 350d
E 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d
2.0
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
GLC 350d
GLE 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C292)GLE 350d
2.0
3.0 TDI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI
GLC 350d
C 300
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 300
2.0
R 2.0 TSI
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI2.0vsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 2014R 2.0 TSI
GLC 350d
E 350 BlueTEC V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 350dvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 350 BlueTEC V6
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 350d - car comparison - FastVsFaster