AUDI A5 Coupe (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDIvsChevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Best estimated range1,115 km693 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Lightest1,539 kg3,393 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 275hp205kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,115km693mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,764mm109in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 3,250-4,250 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has 3 hp more than AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 5.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 5.9 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 has more power, AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI and Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 1,115 km 693 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)3.0 TDI | ChevroletCamaro VI2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 275 hp 205 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,115 km 693 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI | Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 3.0 TDI
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 215 km (134 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 46 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Chevrolet Camaro VI 2.0
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 106 kg lighter
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























