Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

3.6 V6

335 hp3640 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
4.6 s
Fastest top speed
300 km/h
186 mph Unrestricted
290 km/h
180 mph Restricted
Most powerful
335 hp
250 kW
Lightest
1,558 kg
3,435 lb
Best power-to-weight
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
14.7 L/100 km
16.0 mpg US
19.2 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Best estimated range
610 km
379 mi
Largest trunk
258 L
Best overall score
64/100
Best performance score
73/100
Best economy score
75/100
Best practicality score
46/100

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Highest torque
461 Nm
340 lb-ft

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power	335hp250kW	310hp231kW
Torque	385Nm284lb-ft	461Nm340lb-ft
Curb weight	1,558kg3,435lb	1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight	-	1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated	257 km/h 160 mph
To 99% top speed	80.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated	86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	4.6s	6.0s
0-200 km/h	14.9s Calculated	22.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	4.4s Calculated	5.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK	12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK	14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK	10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile	12.6s Calculated	14.1s Calculated
Power-to-weight	215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated	193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated	287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	610km379mi Calculated	512km318mi Calculated
Displacement	3,640cc222cu in	5,665cc346cu in
Length	4,784mm188in	4,914mm193in
Width	1,897mm75in	1,882mm74in
Height	1,348mm53in	1,315mm52in
Wheelbase	2,812mm111in	2,568mm101in
Front track	1,588mm63in	1,542mm61in
Rear track	1,617mm64in	1,540mm61in
Trunk volume	258L	215L
Max trunk volume	-	930L
Doors	2	2
Seats	4	4
Fuel tank	72L	64L
CO2 emissions	-	293g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	6,800 rpm	5,300 rpm	7,050 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	5,200 rpm	4,000 rpm	5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	4.4 s	5.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	4.6 s	6.0 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	14.9 s	22.8 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited	257 km/h 160 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.1 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	5.5 s	6.1 s
1/8 mile 201 m	8.3 s	9.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	10.7 s	11.9 s
1/4 mile 402 m	12.6 s	14.1 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	185 km/h 115 mph	163 km/h 101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	335 hp 250 kW
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 has 25 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	385 Nm 284 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	461 Nm 340 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	1,558 kg 3,435 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	1,605 kg 3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	257 km/h 160 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	4.6 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	6.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	610 km 379 mi
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	512 km 318 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	335 hp 250 kW	4.6 s	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	310 hp 231 kW	6.0 s	257 km/h 160 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6

Power	335 hp 250 kW
0-100 km/h	4.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	258 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,784 mm 188.3 in
Height	1,348 mm 53.1 in

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6

Power	335 hp 250 kW
0-100 km/h	4.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

11.8 L/100 km

19.9 mpg US

23.9 mpg UK

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.0 s
Top speed 257 km/h 160 mph

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK	4.6 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK	6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6	215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp	11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8	193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp	12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6

ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8

Power

335 hp

250 kW

310 hp

231 kW

Torque

385 Nm

284 lb-ft

461 Nm

340 lb-ft

Acceleration

4.6 s

6.0 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

300 km/h186 mph

Restricted

290 km/h180 mph

257 km/h

160 mph

Lightness

1,558 kg

3,435 lb

1,605 kg

3,538 lb

Fuel consumption

11.8 L/100 km

19.9 mpg US

23.9 mpg UK

12.4 L/100 km

19.0 mpg US

22.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	258 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,784 mm 188.3 in
Height	1,348 mm 53.1 in

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	215 L 7.6 cu ft
Length	4,914 mm 193.5 in
Height	1,315 mm 51.8 in

Range score

610 km

379 mi

512 km

318 mi

CO2 score

293 g/km

Trunk score

258 L

9.1 cu ft

215 L

7.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

215 hp/t

160 kW/t

4.7 kg/hp

193 hp/t

144 kW/t

5.2 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6	Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption	11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK	12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	20.65 LC100 km	21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	33.23 LC100 mi	34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal	1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,098 LC/year	3,255 LC/year