Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8vsChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire Roadster
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions264 g/km
- Best estimated range545 km339 mi
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score77/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Highest torque461 Nm340 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk215 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 512km318mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,665cc346cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,914mm193in | 4,060mm160in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 105L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 190L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 293g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 20 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 512 km 318 mi |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.0 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 512 km 318 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 293 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 | Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 41 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























