Car comparison

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6vsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster

SRT-6 3.2i V6

330 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCabriolet / convertible2004-2006
VS

Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998

Z28 5.7 i V8

310 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    255 km/h
    158 mph
  • Most powerful
    330 hp
    246 kW
  • Lightest
    1,495 kg
    3,296 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    221 hp/t
    165 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    264 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    545 km
    339 mi
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
330hp246kW
310hp231kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
472Nm348lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight
1,755kg3,869lb
1,930kg4,255lb
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
To 99% top speed
64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
18.8s
Calculated
21.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
545km339mi
Calculated
538km334mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,199cc195cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
4,060mm160in
4,914mm193in
Width
1,765mm69in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,305mm51in
1,315mm52in
Wheelbase
2,400mm94in
2,568mm101in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,500mm59in
1,540mm61in
Trunk volume
105L
215L
Max trunk volume
190L
930L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
60L
64L
CO2 emissions
264g/km
278g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8PowerTorque
  • Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V66,100 rpm3,500 rpm6,350 rpm
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V85,200 rpm4,000 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.8 s
21.2 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
108 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 20 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 and Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
472 Nm
348 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
255 km/h
158 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
254 km/h
158 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
330 hp
246 kW
5.3 s
255 km/h
158 mph
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
310 hp
231 kW
5.5 s
254 km/h
158 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,060 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
254 km/h
158 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Power
330 hp
246 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
472 Nm
348 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
5.5 s
Top speed
255 km/h
158 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
11.0 L/100 km
21.4 mpg US
25.7 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
105 L
3.7 cu ft
Length
4,060 mm
159.8 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Length
4,914 mm
193.5 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Range score
545 km
339 mi
538 km
334 mi
CO2 score
264 g/km
278 g/km
Trunk score
105 L
3.7 cu ft
215 L
7.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Consumption11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.25 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.98 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,888 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 7 km (5 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8

  • Has 52 Nm more
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 vs Chevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster