BMW M3 Convertible (E46)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24VvsChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire Roadster
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range545 km339 mi
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score77/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 343hp256kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.6s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 521km324mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,246cc198cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 4,060mm160in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,363mm54in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,508mm59in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 105L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 190L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has 13 hp more than Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
Although BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has more power, Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 521 km 324 mi |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 343 hp 256 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 521 km 324 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V | Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























