Chrysler Crossfire Roadster
Car comparison
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6vsFord Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang V Convertible
4.6 i V8 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score77/100
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | - |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 68.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.8s Calculated | 22.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,060mm160in | 4,765mm188in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 105L | 275L |
| Max trunk volume | 190L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.8 s | 22.2 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 304 hp 227 kW |
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 26 hp more than Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V and Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | 304 hp 227 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | FordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Has 26 hp more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang V Convertible 4.6 i V8 24V
- Has 14 Nm more
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























