Maserati Spyder
Car comparison
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VvsChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire Roadster
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque451 Nm333 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range553 km344 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 451Nm333lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,303mm169in | 4,060mm160in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,440mm96in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 105L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 190L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V has 60 hp more than Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 4.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V | Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 31 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























