Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32VvsMaserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Spyder
4.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight245 hp/t183 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque451 Nm333 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 451Nm333lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,281cc261cu in | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,383mm173in | 4,303mm169in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,255mm49in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,440mm96in |
| Front track | 1,568mm62in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 385 hp 287 kW |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V has 5 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
Although Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V has more power, Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 41 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























