Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsChrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire Roadster
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score77/100
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk130 L
- Best practicality score36/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.8s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,060mm160in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,328mm52in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,500mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 105L |
| Max trunk volume | 130L | 190L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 has 47 hp more than Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6: 47 hp (35 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ChryslerCrossfire RoadsterSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Chrysler Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Has 47 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























