Jaguar XK Convertible (X150)
Car comparison
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8vsNissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
3.5 i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful298 hp222 kW
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk200 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 298hp222kW | 283hp211kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.2s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 4,310mm170in |
| Width | - | 1,815mm71in |
| Height | 1,329mm52in | 1,328mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,752mm108in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 200L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 283L | 130L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.2 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 has 15 hp more than Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V and Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.3 s |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)4.2 V8 | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 298 hp 222 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Is 25 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























