Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 2vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 · Stage 1vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 2)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T6 (Stage 1)
Volvo XC60 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed269 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful465 hp347 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest2,016 kg4,445 lb
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465hp347kW+155 hp | 403hp301kW+93 hp | 366hp273kW+56 hp | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft+220 Nm | 540Nm398lb-ft+140 Nm | 488Nm360lb-ft+88 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,016kg4,445lb | 2,016kg4,445lb | 2,016kg4,445lb | 2,016kg4,445lb |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.0s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-15.5 s Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-10.1 s Calculated | 65.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.4 s Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s-9.1 s Calculated | 17.4s-6.4 s Calculated | 19.5s-4.4 s Calculated | 23.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s-1.5 s Calculated | 13.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 13.5s-0.6 s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t172kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 71L | 71L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 181g/km | 181g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 310 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 17.4 s | 19.5 s | 23.9 s |
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.1 s | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s | 13.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp has 155 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 310 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 310 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp: 155 hp (116 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 4.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 5.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 310 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 910 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 465 hp 347 kW | 4.6 s | 269 km/h 167 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 403 hp 301 kW | 5.0 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 366 hp 273 kW | 5.3 s | 251 km/h 156 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 3)465 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 2)403 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 (Stage 1)366 hp | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6310 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 465 hp 347 kW | 403 hp 301 kW | 366 hp 273 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 488 Nm 360 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 269 km/h 167 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | 251 km/h 156 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 910 km 566 mi | 910 km 566 mi | 910 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 1) 366 hp | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 310 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 3) 465 hp
- Has 62 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 (Stage 2) 403 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























