BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) 40ivsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Lightest2,016 kg4,445 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions181 g/km
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score85/100
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range922 km573 mi
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,016kg4,445lb |
| Gross weight | 3,155kg6,956lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 922km573mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,998cc183cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,705mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 205g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) 40i: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-5,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) 40i has 30 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X7 (G07) 40i: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although BMW X7 (G07) 40i has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X7 (G07) 40i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X7 (G07) 40i: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 922 km 573 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)40i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)40i | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 922 km 573 mi | 910 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 205 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) 40i | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) 40i
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Is 304 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 179 L more trunk volume
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























