AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range1,103 km685 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest2,016 kg4,445 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,016kg4,445lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,103km685mi Calculated | 910km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 254mm10in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 24 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 1,103 km 685 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,145 kg 4,729 lb | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,103 km 685 mi | 910 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 193 km (120 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 129 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























