Volga K50
Car comparison
Volga K50 2.0TvsVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont Pro
450TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
Volga K50 2.0T
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,855 kg4,090 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk562 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolgaK502.0T | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,715kg5,986lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.7s Calculated | 50.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,770mm188in | 5,158mm203in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,991mm78in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in | 1,788mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,845mm112in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,719mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 562L | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,532L | 2,427L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolgaK502.0T | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.7 s | 50.1 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has 34 hp more than Volga K50 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Volga K50 2.0T and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volga K50 2.0T: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 705 km 438 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolgaK502.0T | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 562 L 19.8 cu ft | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volga K50 2.0T | Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 14.61 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 23.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,192 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volga K50 2.0T
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 276 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























