Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWhvsVolga K50 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolga K50
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
Volga K50 2.0T
- Lightest1,855 kg4,090 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk562 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 2,995kg6,603lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.4s Calculated | 44.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 705km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 4,770mm188in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,845mm112in |
| Front track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,659mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 562L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 1,532L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | VolgaK502.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.4 s | 44.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh has 7 hp more than Volga K50 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between Volga K50 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| VolgaK502.0T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb |
| VolgaK502.0T | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 7.6 s |
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh and Volga K50 2.0T: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolgaK502.0T | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolgaK502.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh | VolgaK502.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 705 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 562 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 104 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volga K50 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 100 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volga K50 2.0T
- Is 510 kg lighter
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























