Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolga K50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Volga K50

2.0T

238 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Volga K50 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Lightest
    1,855 kg
    4,090 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    562 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolgaK502.0T
Power
254hp189kW
238hp177kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
1,855kg4,090lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
99.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
41.0s
Calculated
44.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,770mm188in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,689mm66in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,845mm112in
Front track
1,640mm65in
-
Rear track
1,645mm65in
-
Ground clearance
170mm7in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
258L
562L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
1,532L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
74L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolga K50 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
VolgaK502.0T5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolgaK502.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.0 s
44.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
VolgaK502.0T
238 hp
177 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 16 hp more than Volga K50 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Volga K50 2.0T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
VolgaK502.0T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
VolgaK502.0T
1,855 kg
4,090 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
VolgaK502.0T
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
VolgaK502.0T8.2 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Volga K50 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga K50 2.0T and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volga K50 2.0T: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
VolgaK502.0T
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
VolgaK502.0T
705 km
438 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
VolgaK502.0T
238 hp
177 kW
8.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
VolgaK502.0T
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolgaK502.0T
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolgaK502.0T
Power
254 hp
189 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
705 km
438 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolga K50 2.0T
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 571 km (355 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volga K50 2.0T

  • Is 281 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 304 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Volga K50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0T
GLB 200 58 kWh
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200 58 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0T
2.0
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0T
28T
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0T
GLB 250
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0T
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0T
450TSI
VS
VolgaK502.0TvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Volga K50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster