Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDI Q6 45 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

AUDI Q6

45 TFSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,136 kg
    4,709 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Largest trunk
    286 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DAUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
254hp189kW
265hp198kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
2,780kg6,129lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
46.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.4mpg US30.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
756km470mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
5,099mm201in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,014mm79in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,784mm70in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,704mm67in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,721mm68in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
-
Trunk volume
258L
286L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
2,398L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
6
Fuel tank
74L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DAUDIQ645 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
46.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
AUDIQ645 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI has 11 hp more than Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
AUDIQ645 TFSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
AUDIQ645 TFSI
2,280 kg
5,027 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
AUDIQ645 TFSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q6 45 TFSI and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and AUDI Q6 45 TFSI: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
AUDIQ645 TFSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
AUDIQ645 TFSI
756 km
470 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
AUDIQ645 TFSI
265 hp
198 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
AUDIQ645 TFSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
AUDIQ645 TFSI
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DAUDIQ645 TFSI
Power
254 hp
189 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
207 km/h129 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
9.3 L/100 km
25.4 mpg US
30.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,784 mm
70.2 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
756 km
470 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DAUDI Q6 45 TFSI
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK9.3 L/100 km25.4 mpg US30.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km16.21 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi26.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,389 L367 US gal306 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,431 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 144 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 520 km (323 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

AUDI Q6 45 TFSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
AUDI Q6 45 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202045 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
45 TFSI
45 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
45 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
45 TFSI
50 71 kWh
VS
AUDIQ645 TFSIvsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs AUDI Q6 45 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster