Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
254hp189kW
186hp139kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
258L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
74L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
61.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 68 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 68 hp (51 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.3 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
895 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
254 hp
189 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
895 km
556 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 68 hp more
  • Has 310 Nm more
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 381 km (237 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 671 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 172 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.5T
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster