Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020

2.0i

249 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2024
VS

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Lightest
    1,814 kg
    3,999 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    137 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    601 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
249hp186kW
254hp189kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,814kg3,999lb
2,136kg4,709lb
Gross weight-
2,781kg6,131lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
89.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
34.4s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
691km429mi
Calculated
1,276km793mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,995mm197in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,648mm65in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,625mm64in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,624mm64in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
170mm7in
Trunk volume
601L
258L
Max trunk volume
1,386L
1,971L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
6
Fuel tank
67L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.4 s
40.9 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 5 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
1,814 kg
3,999 lb
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
229 km/h
142 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i7.5 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
691 km
429 mi
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
249 hp
186 kW
7.5 s
229 km/h
142 mph
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
7.5 s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0iMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
249 hp
186 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
1,814 kg
3,999 lb
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
601 L
21.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,648 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
691 km
429 mi
1,276 km
793 mi
Trunk score
601 L
21.2 cu ft
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0iMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Is 322 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 343 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 185 Nm more
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 585 km (364 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0i
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0i
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsJaguarF-Pace25t
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2.0i
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0ivsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i vs Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster