Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSIvsJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,481 kg3,265 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score86/100
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range691 km429 mi
- Largest trunk601 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,481kg3,265lb | 1,814kg3,999lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | - |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 89.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 633km393mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,528mm60in | 1,648mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,624mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 601L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,386L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 249 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has 4 hp more than Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,814 kg 3,999 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 7.5 s |
Although Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI and Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 633 km 393 mi |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentor2.0 TSI | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,481 kg 3,265 lb | 1,814 kg 3,999 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 633 km 393 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 601 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 333 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
- Has 151 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























