238 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present
0-100 km/h 8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Performance
| Power | 238hp177kW |
|---|---|
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
Efficiency and range
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
|---|---|
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel tank | 62L |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated |
Engine and drivetrain
| Engine | JLH-4G20TDB |
|---|---|
| Body type | SUV |
| Fuel type | Gasoline |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged |
| Drive type | AWD |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Gears | 8-speed |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinders | 4 |
| Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Dimensions and space
| Length | 4,770mm188in |
|---|---|
| Width | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,845mm112in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 562L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,532L |
| Doors | 5 |
| Seats | 5 |
Performance spider chart
Current vehicle compared with the precomputed median score across the database.
Power benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 238 hp 177 kW |
| Database median | 262 hp 195 kW |
0-100 km/h benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · s
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.2 s |
| Database median | 6.4 s |
Top speed benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Top speed. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Database median | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Fuel consumption benchmark
Current vehicle compared with the database median for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| Database median | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volga K50 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Volga K50 2.0TPowerTorque
- Volga K50 2.0T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolgaK502.0T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volga K50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12