Car comparison

Volga K50 2.0T · Stage 3vsVolga K50 2.0T · Stage 2vsVolga K50 2.0T · Stage 1vsVolga K50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volga K50

2.0T (Stage 3)

357 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present
VS

Volga K50

2.0T (Stage 2)

309 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present
VS

Volga K50

2.0T (Stage 1)

281 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present
VS

Volga K50

2.0T

238 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    249 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    357 hp
    266 kW
  • Highest torque
    543 Nm
    400 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,855 kg
    4,090 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    192 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    705 km
    438 mi
  • Largest trunk
    562 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hpVolgaK502.0T238 hp
Power
357hp266kW+119 hp
309hp231kW+71 hp
281hp209kW+43 hp
238hp177kW
Torque
543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm
473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm
427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,855kg4,090lb
1,855kg4,090lb
1,855kg4,090lb
1,855kg4,090lb
Gross weight
2,265kg4,993lb
2,265kg4,993lb
2,265kg4,993lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
+34 km/h
237 km/h
147 mph
+22 km/h
229 km/h
142 mph
+14 km/h
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.6s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph-12.3 s
Calculated
77.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph-7.2 s
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph-4.0 s
Calculated
84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s-1.8 s
7.0s-1.2 s
7.4s-0.8 s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
22.9s-21.8 s
Calculated
27.8s-16.9 s
Calculated
32.2s-12.5 s
Calculated
44.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s-1.7 s
Calculated
6.6s-1.1 s
Calculated
7.0s-0.7 s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s-1.6 s
Calculated
14.9s-1.0 s
Calculated
15.3s-0.6 s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
192hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
705km438mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
705km438mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,770mm188in
4,770mm188in
4,770mm188in
4,770mm188in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,689mm66in
1,689mm66in
1,689mm66in
1,689mm66in
Wheelbase
2,845mm112in
2,845mm112in
2,845mm112in
2,845mm112in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
210mm8in
210mm8in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
562L
562L
562L
562L
Max trunk volume
1,532L
1,532L
1,532L
1,532L
Doors
5
5
5
5
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
62L
62L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hpVolga K50 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hpVolga K50 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hpVolga K50 2.0T 238 hpPowerTorque
  • Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga K50 2.0T 238 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolgaK502.0T238 hp5,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hpVolgaK502.0T238 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
7.0 s
7.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.9 s
27.8 s
32.2 s
44.7 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.8 s
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.6 s
12.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.9 s
15.3 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
156 km/h
97 mph
151 km/h
94 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
357 hp
266 kW
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
309 hp
231 kW
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
281 hp
209 kW
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
238 hp
177 kW

Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp has 119 hp more than Volga K50 2.0T 238 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Volga K50 2.0T 238 hp and Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp: 119 hp (89 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
543 Nm
400 lb-ft
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
473 Nm
348 lb-ft
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
427 Nm
315 lb-ft
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
1,855 kg
4,090 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
249 km/h
155 mph
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
237 km/h
147 mph
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
229 km/h
142 mph
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp6.4 s
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp7.0 s
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp7.4 s
VolgaK502.0T238 hp8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp and Volga K50 2.0T 238 hp: 1.8 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hp and Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
192 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
705 km
438 mi
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
705 km
438 mi
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
705 km
438 mi
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
705 km
438 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
357 hp
266 kW
6.4 s
249 km/h
155 mph
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
309 hp
231 kW
7.0 s
237 km/h
147 mph
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
281 hp
209 kW
7.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
238 hp
177 kW
8.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
Power
357 hp
266 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
Power
309 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
Power
281 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
Power
357 hp
266 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
Power
309 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
Power
281 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
6.4 s
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hp
192 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
VolgaK502.0T238 hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolgaK502.0T (Stage 3)357 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 2)309 hpVolgaK502.0T (Stage 1)281 hpVolgaK502.0T238 hp
Power
357 hp
266 kW
309 hp
231 kW
281 hp
209 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
543 Nm
400 lb-ft
473 Nm
348 lb-ft
427 Nm
315 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
7.0 s
7.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
Fuel consumption
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,770 mm
187.8 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Range score
705 km
438 mi
705 km
438 mi
705 km
438 mi
705 km
438 mi
Trunk score
562 L
19.8 cu ft
562 L
19.8 cu ft
562 L
19.8 cu ft
562 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
192 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hpVolga K50 2.0T (Stage 2) 309 hpVolga K50 2.0T (Stage 1) 281 hpVolga K50 2.0T 238 hp
Consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.40 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.78 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,310 LC/year2,310 LC/year2,310 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volga K50 2.0T (Stage 3) 357 hp

  • Has 48 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volga K50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Volga K50 2.0T · Stage 3 vs Volga K50 2.0T · Stage 2 vs Volga K50 2.0T · Stage 1 vs Volga K50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster