Bugatti Chiron
Car comparison
Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16vsRimac Nevera 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRimac Nevera
120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16
- Fastest top speed455 km/h283 mph Unrestricted440 km/h273 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score49/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | RimacNevera120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,600hp1,193kW | 1,914hp1,427kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 455 km/h283 mph Restricted 440 km/h273 mph Calculated | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.3s99% target: 450 km/h / 280 mph Calculated | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.4s | 2.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.8s | 4.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.3s Calculated | 1.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 9.2s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb Calculated | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 465km289mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | - |
| Length | 4,733mm186in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 2,183mm86in | 1,986mm78in |
| Height | 1,212mm48in | 1,208mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,745mm108in |
| Front track | 1,749mm69in | - |
| Rear track | 1,662mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | RimacNevera120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.3 s | 1.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.4 s | 2.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 12.7 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 455 km/h283 mph Restricted 440 km/h273 mph Limited | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.2 s | 3.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.2 s | 5.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.2 s | 8.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 270 km/h 168 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 314 hp more than Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16.
The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 314 hp (234 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | Unrestricted 455 km/h283 mph Restricted 440 km/h273 mph |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 2.4 s |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 2.4 s | Unrestricted 455 km/h283 mph Restricted 440 km/h273 mph |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16 | RimacNevera120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.4 s | 2.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 455 km/h283 mph Restricted 440 km/h273 mph | 412 km/h 256 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.5 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 465 km 289 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 802 hp/t 598 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,644 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 8.0 W16
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 314 hp more
- Has 760 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























