Rimac Nevera
Car comparison
Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsFerrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F8 Spider
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed412 km/h256 mph
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
- Best practicality score39/100
Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RimacNevera120 kWh | FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914hp1,427kW | 720hp537kW |
| Torque | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft | 770Nm568lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 8.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated | 514hp/t384kW/t233hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated | 550Nm/t368lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 3,902cc238cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 4,611mm182in |
| Width | 1,986mm78in | 1,979mm78in |
| Height | 1,208mm48in | 1,206mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,677mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,646mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 78L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RimacNevera120 kWh | FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 11.1 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.7 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 284 km/h 176 mph | 226 km/h 141 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 720 hp 537 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 1,194 hp more than Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 1,194 hp (890 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 2.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 514 hp/t 384 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | 720 hp 537 kW | 2.9 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RimacNevera120 kWh | FerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 720 hp 537 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 514 hp/t 384 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 1,194 hp more
- Has 1,590 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 72 km/h (45 mph) higher top speed
- Has 376 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari F8 Spider 3.9 V8
- Is 750 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























