Rimac Nevera
Car comparison
Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsMcLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren Speedtail
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed412 km/h256 mph
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,597 kg3,521 lb
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RimacNevera120 kWh | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914hp1,427kW | 1,070hp798kW |
| Torque | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft | 1,150Nm848lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated | 47.1s99% target: 399 km/h / 248 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.5s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated | 670hp/t500kW/t304hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated | 720Nm/t482lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 5,137mm202in |
| Width | 1,986mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,208mm48in | 1,120mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,670mm105in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RimacNevera120 kWh | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 11.1 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.7 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.2 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.5 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 284 km/h 176 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 844 hp more than McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 844 hp (629 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 403 km/h 250 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 3.0 s | 403 km/h 250 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RimacNevera120 kWh | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 1,070 hp 798 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 412 km/h 256 mph | 403 km/h 250 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 844 hp more
- Has 1,210 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 220 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Is 553 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























