Car comparison

Rimac Nevera 120 kWhvsBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present
VS

Bugatti Centodieci

8.0 W16

1600 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2022-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    412 km/h
    256 mph
  • Most powerful
    1,914 hp
    1,427 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    890 hp/t
    664 kW/t
    1.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRimacNevera120 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
1,914hp1,427kW
1,600hp1,193kW
Torque
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
Curb weight
2,150kg4,740lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
44.2s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.0s
2.4s
0-200 km/h
4.8s
Calculated
6.1s
0-60 mph
1.9s
Calculated
2.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
21.5L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.5s
Calculated
9.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
802hp/t598kW/t364hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
465km289mi
Calculated
Displacement-
7,993cc488cu in
Length
4,750mm187in
4,665mm184in
Width
1,986mm78in
2,020mm80in
Height
1,208mm48in
1,215mm48in
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
2,711mm107in
Front track-
1,749mm69in
Rear track-
1,666mm66in
Ground clearance-
125mm5in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
100L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRimacNevera120 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
1.9 s
2.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.0 s
2.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.8 s
6.1 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
11.1 s
15.3 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.5 s
1.7 s
330 ft
101 m
3.9 s
4.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.7 s
6.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.2 s
7.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.5 s
9.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
284 km/h
176 mph
258 km/h
160 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 314 hp more than Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16.

The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 314 hp (234 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W162.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
2.4 s
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRimacNevera120 kWhBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
1,600 hp
1,193 kW
Torque
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.0 s
2.4 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Unrestricted
395 km/h245 mph
Restricted
380 km/h236 mph
Lightness
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
Fuel consumption
-
21.5 L/100 km
10.9 mpg US
13.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,665 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,215 mm
47.8 in
Range score
-
465 km
289 mi
Power-to-weight score
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
802 hp/t
598 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Consumption21.5 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km37.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi60.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,225 L852 US gal709 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,644 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 314 hp more
  • Has 760 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
120 kWh
8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
120 kWh
90 kWh
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsRimacConcept One90 kWh
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
8.0 W16
8.3 V16
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsBugattiTourbillon8.3 V16
120 kWh
5.0 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsMcLarenW14.0 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
8.0 W16
6.5 V12
VS
BugattiCentodieci8.0 W16vsLamborghiniCountach LPI 800-46.5 V12
120 kWh
6.5 V12
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsLamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12
120 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariSF90 Stradale4.0 V8
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh vs Bugatti Centodieci 8.0 W16 - car comparison - FastVsFaster