McLaren Speedtail
Car comparison
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8vsRimac Concept One 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRimac Concept One
90 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed403 km/h250 mph
- Lightest1,597 kg3,521 lb
- Best power-to-weight670 hp/t500 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Most powerful1,224 hp913 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070hp798kW | 1,224hp913kW |
| Torque | 1,150Nm848lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 47.1s99% target: 399 km/h / 248 mph Calculated | 33.7s99% target: 351 km/h / 218 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 670hp/t500kW/t304hp/1000 lb Calculated | 644hp/t480kW/t292hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 720Nm/t482lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 4,146mm163in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,070mm42in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,563mm101in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 16.6 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 6.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 8.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 9.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 250 km/h 155 mph | 255 km/h 159 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW |
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh has 154 hp more than McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 and Rimac Concept One 90 kWh: 154 hp (115 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 355 km/h 221 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 2.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 3.0 s | 403 km/h 250 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW | 2.5 s | 355 km/h 221 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | McLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8 | RimacConcept One90 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,070 hp 798 kW | 1,224 hp 913 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,150 Nm 848 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 403 km/h 250 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.6 L/100 km 15.1 mpg US 18.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 670 hp/t 500 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,340 L618 US gal515 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,095 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
McLaren Speedtail 4.0 V8
- Is 303 kg lighter
- Has 48 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Has 154 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























