Bugatti Chiron
Car comparison
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16vsRimac Concept One 90 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRimac Concept One
90 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful1,500 hp1,119 kW
- Best power-to-weight752 hp/t561 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score47/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Lightest1,900 kg4,189 lb
- Best performance score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500hp1,119kW | 1,224hp913kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.7s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 33.7s99% target: 351 km/h / 218 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 2.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 9.6s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb Calculated | 644hp/t480kW/t292hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 444km276mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | - |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,146mm163in |
| Width | 2,038mm80in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,212mm48in | 1,070mm42in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,563mm101in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 516g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 15.9 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.6 s | 9.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 252 km/h 157 mph | 255 km/h 159 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW |
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 has 276 hp more than Rimac Concept One 90 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Rimac Concept One 90 kWh and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 276 hp (206 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 355 km/h 221 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 2.5 s |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 2.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 2.5 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| RimacConcept One90 kWh | 1,224 hp 913 kW | 2.5 s | 355 km/h 221 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiChiron8.0 W16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RimacConcept One90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiChiron8.0 W16 | RimacConcept One90 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,500 hp 1,119 kW | 1,224 hp 913 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 355 km/h 221 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.5 L/100 km 10.5 mpg US 12.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 444 km 276 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 516 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 752 hp/t 561 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 644 hp/t 480 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 39.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 63.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,906 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
- Has 276 hp more
- Has 65 km/h (40 mph) higher top speed
- Has 108 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Rimac Concept One 90 kWh
- Is 95 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























