Car comparison

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16vsRimac Nevera 120 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bugatti Chiron

8.0 W16

1500 hp7993 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-present
VS

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16

  • Fastest top speed
    420 km/h
    261 mph
  • Lightest
    1,995 kg
    4,398 lb
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.0 s
  • Most powerful
    1,914 hp
    1,427 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    890 hp/t
    664 kW/t
    1.1 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBugattiChiron8.0 W16RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,500hp1,119kW
1,914hp1,427kW
Torque
1,600Nm1,180lb-ft
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
Curb weight
1,995kg4,398lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
To 99% top speed
56.7s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph
Calculated
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.5s
2.0s
0-200 km/h
6.5s
4.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.4s
Calculated
1.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
35.2L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
9.6s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
752hp/t561kW/t341hp/1000 lb
Calculated
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
802Nm/t537lb-ft/ton
Calculated
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
444km276mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
7,993cc488cu in
-
Length
4,544mm179in
4,750mm187in
Width
2,038mm80in
1,986mm78in
Height
1,212mm48in
1,208mm48in
Wheelbase
2,711mm107in
2,745mm108in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
100L
-
CO2 emissions
516g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBugattiChiron8.0 W16RimacNevera120 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.4 s
1.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.5 s
2.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.5 s
4.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
15.9 s
11.1 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.5 s
330 ft
101 m
4.3 s
3.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.4 s
5.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.1 s
7.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.6 s
8.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
252 km/h
157 mph
284 km/h
176 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 414 hp more than Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16.

The biggest power difference is between Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 414 hp (309 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
420 km/h
261 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W162.5 s
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
2.5 s
420 km/h
261 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BugattiChiron8.0 W16
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBugattiChiron8.0 W16RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,500 hp
1,119 kW
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
Torque
1,600 Nm
1,180 lb-ft
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.5 s
2.0 s
Top speed
420 km/h
261 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Lightness
1,995 kg
4,398 lb
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
Fuel consumption
22.5 L/100 km
10.5 mpg US
12.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,544 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,212 mm
47.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Range score
444 km
276 mi
-
CO2 score
516 g/km
-
Power-to-weight score
752 hp/t
561 kW/t
1.3 kg/hp
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
Consumption22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km39.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi63.37 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,375 L892 US gal742 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,906 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16

  • Is 155 kg lighter
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 414 hp more
  • Has 760 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 138 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

8.0 W16
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0 W16
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
8.0 W16
90 kWh
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsRimacConcept One90 kWh
8.0 W16
5.0 V8
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
8.0 W16
4.0 V8
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsMcLarenSenna4.0 V8
8.0 W16
6.3 V12
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
8.0 W16
8.3 V16
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsBugattiTourbillon8.3 V16
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
8.0 W16
6.3 V12
VS
BugattiChiron8.0 W16vsFerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12
Bugatti Chiron 8.0 W16 vs Rimac Nevera 120 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster