Koenigsegg CCR
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKoenigsegg CC8S
4.7 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed395 km/h245 mph
- Most powerful806 hp601 kW
- Highest torque919 Nm678 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight683 hp/t509 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk120 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,175 kg2,590 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 806hp601kW | 655hp488kW |
| Torque | 919Nm678lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,180kg2,601lb | 1,175kg2,590lb |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated | 50.8s99% target: 386 km/h / 240 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.5s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 683hp/t509kW/t310hp/1000 lb Calculated | 557hp/t416kW/t253hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 779Nm/t521lb-ft/ton Calculated | 638Nm/t427lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 471km292mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,719cc288cu in | 4,700cc287cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,190mm165in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,990mm78in |
| Height | 1,020mm40in | 1,070mm42in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,660mm105in |
| Max trunk volume | 120L | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 6,900 rpm | 5,700 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 6,800 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.5 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 390 km/h 242 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 246 km/h 153 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW |
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V has 151 hp more than Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V: 151 hp (113 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 390 km/h 242 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 3.2 s |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V and Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | 806 hp 601 kW | 3.2 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | 655 hp 488 kW | 3.5 s | 390 km/h 242 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32V | KoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 806 hp 601 kW | 655 hp 488 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 919 Nm 678 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 390 km/h 242 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 471 km 292 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 683 hp/t 509 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 557 hp/t 416 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,463 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCR 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 151 hp more
- Has 169 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 126 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Koenigsegg CC8S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Is 5 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























